Trusted by 12 Fortune 500 Companies
Schedule Demo

Experience RAG in Action

Query our demo knowledge base powered by production-grade RAG

Interactive RAG Demo

Suggested queries:

Questions About Your Results?

AI chatbot trained on RAG methodology. Can answer: "Why is my payback so fast?" "What if I have 100 employees instead?" Escalates complex questions to human.

RAG Assistant: Hi! I'm here to help you understand your demo results. Ask me anything about RAG, ROI calculations, or how this applies to your organization.

Live Demo Metrics

Real-time performance statistics from our demo system

0
Queries today
87.3%
Average accuracy
1.2s
Average latency
🔍 AI/ML
Most queried topic

Example Queries & Results

See what RAG can do with these real-world examples

Complex Multi-Hop Query

Query: "How do transformer models differ from RNNs in handling long-range dependencies, and which papers introduced these concepts?"
Retrieved Sources: "Attention Is All You Need" (Vaswani 2017), "LSTM" (Hochreiter 1997), 3 other papers
Answer: Transformers use self-attention mechanisms to capture long-range dependencies more effectively than RNNs...
Why This Demonstrates RAG: Multi-document synthesis, temporal reasoning

Specific Fact Finding

Query: "What was Tesla's revenue in Q2 2023?"
Retrieved Sources: Tesla Q2 2023 10-Q filing
Answer: "$24.927 billion" with exact citation
Why This Demonstrates RAG: Precise fact retrieval with source

Cross-Document Comparison

Query: "Compare force majeure clauses in contracts A vs B"
Retrieved Sources: Two contract documents, sections highlighted
Answer: Side-by-side comparison of key differences in force majeure provisions...
Why This Demonstrates RAG: Cross-document analysis

Behind the Scenes

See exactly how our RAG system processes your queries

Your Query: "What is attention mechanism?"
1. Embedding (50ms)
Convert query to vector using sentence-transformers
Vector: [0.23, -0.15, 0.67, ...] (384 dimensions)
2. Retrieval (120ms)
Search Pinecone vector DB (5,000 papers indexed)
Find top 5 most similar documents
Similarity scores: 0.89, 0.85, 0.82, 0.79, 0.76
3. Reranking (30ms)
Cross-encoder rescores documents
New ranking: [Doc 2, Doc 1, Doc 5, Doc 3, Doc 4]
4. Context Assembly (10ms)
Extract relevant passages from top 3 docs
~2,000 tokens of context
5. Generation (800ms)
Send to GPT-4 with context
Generate answer with citations
Your Answer: "The attention mechanism, introduced in..."

Code Walkthrough

# This is what powers the demo above
async def answer_query(query: str, dataset: str):
    # Step 1: Embed query
    query_vector = embedding_model.encode(query)
    
    # Step 2: Retrieve similar documents
    results = vector_db.search(
        vector=query_vector,
        dataset=dataset,
        top_k=5
    )
    
    # Step 3: Rerank for relevance
    reranked = reranker.score(query, results)
    top_docs = reranked[:3]
    
    # Step 4: Generate answer
    context = format_context(top_docs)
    prompt = f"""Context:
{context}

Question: {query}

Answer the question using only the context provided.
Cite sources using [1], [2] notation."""
    
    answer = await llm.generate(prompt)
    
    return {
        "answer": answer,
        "sources": top_docs,
        "confidence": calculate_confidence(reranked),
        "latency": measure_latency()
    }
                

Performance Breakdown

5,000
Documents indexed
2.5GB
Text content
500MB
Compressed vectors
$0.02
Cost per query

This Demo Has Constraints

Honesty builds trust - here's what this demo doesn't show

Static Dataset

Demo uses fixed datasets that don't update in real-time

Limited Scale

5,000 documents vs enterprise 1M+ docs

Public Data Only

No proprietary or confidential information

Simplified Architecture

Production systems have more components

Your Production System Would Include:

🔄

Real-time Data Ingestion

Automatic updates as new documents arrive

📊

100TB+ Scale

Handle enterprise-scale document repositories

🔐

Advanced Security

Document-level permissions and audit trails

🎯

Custom Models

Fine-tuned embeddings for your domain

How Does This Compare?

RAG vs other approaches for enterprise search

Metric This Demo (RAG) Base LLM Only Keyword Search
Answer Quality Detailed, accurate with citations ✅ Generic, no sources ⚠️ List of documents ❌
Response Time 1.2 seconds 0.5 seconds 0.2 seconds
Accuracy 95% (with sources) 70% (unverifiable) 30% (user work required)
Cost per Query $0.02 $0.01 $0.001
Best For Enterprise knowledge retrieval General knowledge questions Simple keyword matching

Takeaway: RAG balances accuracy, speed, and usability for enterprise knowledge

Learn More About RAG

Ready to Build This for Your Data?

Let's discuss how RAG can transform your enterprise knowledge management